E.on and RWE pull out of nuclear

Announced today that E.on and RWE are pulling out of the nuclear industry in the UK as we forecast in this blog in April 2011.


We are to attend the RWE and E.on shareholder meetings in April and May to thank the boards and shareholders of the companies for taking such a sensible decision for their shareholders and the British public


Many thanks.......


No to Gazprom or any other foreign energy companies.


We weant energy independence!




Shepperdine Against Nuclear Energy

Shepperdine Against Nuclear Energy
The first of two known accidents/errors in the last four yearss at the aged plant at Oldbury

Thursday, 3 May 2012

SANE addresses E.on's shareholders and appeals to the Board to consider renewables for the Oldbury site

Here is the transcript of a speech we will present at E.on's AGM in Germany today..........



Hello, My name is Reg Illingworth and I am from Oldbury in South Gloucestershire in England and I represent a community whose opinions have been largely ignored since E.on commenced buying land off the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) in 2008.

Our community had distinct relief for both the shareholders of E.on and the residents of South Gloucestershire when we heard that E.on and RWE had finally realised that the economics of the construction of a new nuclear power station at Oldbury was not viable.

I am here to thank the Boards for making the decision to sell their interest in Horizon and to ask who they intend to sell their interest to?

Rosatom , to our knowledge, are the only confirmed interested party at this stage and their intention would be to build the 1200-Mwe ‘NPP 2006’ in the UK.

They would be the supplier of the reactors but would not be the credible nuclear power operator (CNPO) as detailed in the 2008 government White Paper on Nuclear Power.

Given the already prolonged Generic Design Assessment (GDA) procedure of new reactors by the UK Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) it is doubtful whether this reactor would get approval within another three years.

To date neither the Areva EPR or the Westinghouse AP1000 have full approval from the ONR even after this length of time.

According to the 2008 White Paper there must also be a credible nuclear power operator such as E.on, RWE or EDf to operate the plant once Horizon has developed the site.

Who will this be? Will any purchaser , if any , be regarded as credible by the Department of Energy and Climate Change?

The Rosatom subsidiary, Rosenergoatom , is an operator of nuclear power stations in Russia but unlike RWE and E.on they would not be considered to be credible in the UK without much analysis and deliberation which will take time.

If we look at two other important players in the UK nuclear market:-

Centrica, who have recently said that they are questioning their involvement with Edf in the joint venture they have to build new nuclear reactors at Hinkley Point and at Sizewell. They now regard the project as too risky for the significant capital investment they would have to make, similar to E.on and RWE.

Edf themselves will be under severe pressure to reign in their nuclear ambitions if Hollande should win the presidential election later this week, with no subsidy evident from the UK government and the French government loath to extend any more money to developing new nuclear.

So within a few weeks the value of Horizons development sites could be very low indeed, maybe we could almost call it a fire sale!

And sadly, you , the shareholders of E.on will suffer.

Given that the site at Oldbury has to be deployed by 2025 and that Horizon has previously stated that the first reactor would be deployed in 2025 any additional time lags, such as approval of a new reactor, would make the site non-deployable well after 2025.

This would therefore mean that the site does not comply with the stated aims of the Department of Energy and Climate Change in the UK (DECC) and the site would have no value as a development site for new nuclear.

Having said all of this there is an upside for Horizon , RWE and E.on in that the Oldbury site lies on the banks of the River Severn which has the second highest tidal range of any river in the world.

Can Horizon be converted from a nuclear power development company to a tidal power development company ?

Maybe the joint venture could exploit this asset and take forward the immense power that the UK has around the full perimeter of its shores.

We, as the communities around the site, would relish the opportunity to become completely involved in transferring Horizons nuclear intentions for the development into a renewable business bedrock for generations to come.

Given the current value of the site is diminishing would E.on and RWE consider a joint venture with our community and energy co-operatives in Bristol to take this forward and lay the foundations for New Energy Co-operation in the 21
st Century .

So, are you considering non-nuclear alternatives for the Oldbury site?

Are you willing to discuss options for the sale of the site with our local community representatives?

Thank you for your time and I wish the E.on shareholders and board success in changing course to a business model that respects local communities and environmental necessities.

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

Dodgy Russian Company to buy stake in Horizon

This article is from the Moscow Times and indicates that Rosatom covet a shareholding in Horizon.

Will Charles Hendry and Hergen Hayes allow them to own part of Horizon, do they see them as legitimate investors in the British energy infrastructure?

Only time and perhaps roubles will tell.

Rosatom Reportedly Looking at U.K. Market
02 April 2012
The Moscow Times
State-run nuclear holding Rosatom might buy a stake in the $24 billion Horizon Project to build atomic power stations in Britain, Kommersant reported Monday, citing an unidentified official at the Russian company.

German companies RWE and E.ON had previously owned a share in the project to build two power stations, one in Oldbury, Gloucestershire, and one in Wylfa, Wales, but intend to pull out. Rosatom wants to take their stake, the source told Kommersant.

"This market seems very promising," the source said.

But it remains to be seen whether the British market will accept Rosatom, being a Russian company with a checkered history — a senior executive was arrested last July on embezzlement charges.

"The appearance of Rosatom in new nuclear power projects is most likely to lower British people's level of trust in nuclear energy," Simon Harrison, director of energy for consulting company Mott MacDonald, told The Times, Kommersant reported.

Another source at The Times suggested that British politicians might not approve Rosatom's approach because they do not want to rely too heavily on Russia for energy, Kommersant wrote.

In anticipation of this, Rosatom has already employed an unspecified international PR company to improve its image abroad, Kommersant's source reported.

The German companies cited their reasons for leaving the Horizon Project as a shortage of project funding, a long return-on-investment period and an increase in the companies' costs following the recent disaster in Japan.

The two power stations are scheduled for completion by 2015, with a combined output of 6 gigawatts.



Read more: http://www.themoscowtimes.com/business/article/rosatom-reportedly-looking-at-uk-market/455969.html#ixzz1r61Bev8F
The Moscow Times

Thursday, 29 March 2012

Our friends in Germany.....Urgewald

Dear All,

Congratulations!!!!! 

Below is the translation of an article from today's Handelsblatt (Germany's most important economic daily). Please let me know if you are still planning to come to the RWE and E.ON annual meetings.

Anyway, do let me know what your plans are.

All the best!
Heffa


No new nuclear plants – RWE and Eon drop nuclear plans in Great Britain

 

E.ON and RWE are giving up their plans to build new nuclear power plants in Great Britain. Statements from company circles to the "Handelsblatt" confirmed this information.  The energy companies had planned investments running into the billions.

 

Düsseldorf/London: The energy companies RWE and E.ON have closed the file on their billion dollar plans for building new nuclear plants in Great Britain. On Thursday, RWE  announced its intention to exit the Horizon Joint Venture. „Parallel to this, E.ON also announced its exit“, according to reports. Amongst other things, the high costs were said to be a reason for the abandonment. „Now it´s our aim to find a buyer for Horizon Nuclear Power.“ The utilities' original idea was build several reactors in Great Britain, for which they had planned investments worth tens of billions. Both companies refused to provide an official statement on their change of plans.

 

Following the notification, the shares of E.ON und RWE continued to make losses. For the two biggest German energy providers Great Britain is one of the most important foreign markets. E.ON and RWE had founded the Horizon Joint Venture a few years ago in order to build new nuclear plants with a total output of 6000 MW by 2025. Over the past few years, E.ON and RWE had claimed that "this programme will cost around 18 billions Euro“.

 

Doubts about the project had been increasing. Uncertain political and economic conditions, significantly rising costs and building delays in the construction of nuclear plants in France and Finland as well as low electricity prices depressed the overall mood.

 

„These conditions definitely do not motivate to take on these risks“, E.ON board member Klaus-Dieter Maubach said recently. „It´s just not possible to build a nuclear power plant when electricity costs are at 60 Euro per MW“ Peter Terium, chef of RWE, had explained earlier. Terium has set the bar high.

*********************************************
UNABHۀNGIGE ARBEIT BRAUCHT UNABHۀNGIGES GELD!

Bitte unterstüŸtzen Sie unsere Arbeit durch eine Spende
GLS Bank / Konto 4035 295 900 / BLZ 430 609 67

urgewald e.V. ist als gemeinnüŸtzig und besonders fšörderungswŸrdig anerkannt.
*****************************************************
Heffa SchüŸcking
Urgewald e.V.
Von-Galen-Straße 4
D-48336 Sassenberg
Tel. +49-2583-1031
+49-2583-9189937 (direkt)
Fax  +49-2583-4220
Mobil +49-160-96761436
http://www.urgewald.de

*****************************************************

E.on and RWE leave Horizon as a shell......

I am writing to inform you that, following a strategic review separately undertaken by our shareholders RWE npower and E.ON, they have taken the decision not to proceed with developing new nuclear generation in the UK.


Please find attached a statement from Horizon providing further information, along with press releases from both E.ON UK and RWE npower.

Clearly this is a significant development and one which will create some uncertainty. However, Horizon has created strong options for development at Wylfa and Oldbury and we will work with our shareholders as they investigate opportunities for new ownership. It is our intention to provide clarity on the next steps for Horizon as quickly as possible.

We will make available further information as soon as it is possible to do so.


Kind regards

Alan Raymant
Chief Operating Officer
Horizon Nuclear Power













Wednesday, 28 March 2012

Letter from Local Resident Concerned about New Build


Minister of State (Pensions)
 Steve Webb MP (LD)
Dear Prof Webb,
Nuclear Emergency Planning . South Gloucestershire
I   object most strongly to the building of new nuclear power stations at Hinkley Point , 60 km from my home, Oldbury, only 14 km from my home, or anywhere else.  I joined the Liberal Democrat Party in 1999 mainly because I supported  the party’s environmental policies. I  am now  very disappointed and puzzled at Ed Davey’s willingness to agree to  building new nuclear power stations, especially considering his statement in 2006, as follows:-
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change Rt Hon Mr Edward Davey MP (LD)
http://energyjobblog.com/tag/ed-davey/ 
As Lib Dem Trade and Industry spokesman in 2006 Mr Davey said: ‘in addition to posing safety and environmental risks, nuclear power will only be possible with vast taxpayer subsidies or a rigged market. ‘It is an issue that crops up in my postbag time and again. People don’t want nuclear, but they don’t know what the alternatives are. Now they do, and the alternatives are cleaner, safer, greener and better for the environment and the taxpayer.’”
 In my opinion any financial arrangements where nuclear energy can be classified as “renewable”, “clean” and “sustainable are unforgivable as nuclear energy certainly does not belong in any of these categories.

Nuclear radiation leaks and accidents do occur. I believe that residents  who live within a 1.5 km radius of Oldbury Nuclear Power Station are provided with instructions about  procedures of what steps to take in a nuclear emergency and also given  Potassium Iodate  Tablets to take to prevent the uptake of radioactive Iodine.  In 2004 South Glos FOE asked Boots in Thornbury to stock  Potassium Iodate 85 mg Tablets for the general public to buy, which was reported in the Gazette. I bought some of the tablets myself but unfortunately the tablets only have a shelf life of 30 months. http://www.gazetteseries.co.uk/archive/2004/02/06/South+Gloucestershire+Archive/6672667.Tablets_available_in_the_event_of_an_N_plant_attack/ 

In  August 2011 the nuclear accident in Japan was very much in my mind when I decided to personally investigate what were the nuclear power emergency procedures in Yate, South Glos, as I was under the impression that all public bodies hold a folder with specific instructions as what to do in case of such an emergency. I went into Yate Library to ask them if they had such a folder and the librarian did try to find out if such an item an existed and the librarian even emailed me at my home a few days later to say no, they hadn’t got such a specific folder on the premises. I then went into the new Health /Minor Injuries Centre in  Yate,  and the reply  was also that there not such a folder held by them . I finally went into Boots the Chemist, and spoke to a very helpful pharmacist. The Boots pharmacist said they had been overwhelmed with requests from members of the public wanting to buy Potassium Iodate Tablets when the Fukishima earthquake and tsunami caused the nuclear power reactor accident in Japan in March 2011. In particular she said flight crew members were trying to buy Potassium Iodate tablets as their employer airlines had asked them to do so. The sympathetic pharmacist had contacted Boots head office and was informed by them that as a company  Boots  do not stock the tablets and would not provide them.
            I think that all schools, hospitals, office blocks, public transport etc. should stock these tablets and have a responsibility to include awareness of nuclear radiation dangers as well as the usual health and safety and fire procedures. I am not sure if South Glos is a member of the Nuclear  Free  Local Authorities but others in this group  share my concerns, see below:_ 

 28th February 2012   Nuclear Free Local Authorities  raise nuclear emergency planning concerns in Greenpeace International report with Dept Energy and Climate Change and the Office for Nuclear Regulation.

The nuclear free local authorities have raised new issues around nuclear emergency planning following the publication of one of the most definitive analyses of the Fukushima disaster by Greenpeace International. The report „Lessons of Fukushima‟ has been developed by independent specialists for Greenpeace International as the first anniversary of the Fukushima nuclear disaster approaches on March 11th. A detailed chapter on nuclear emergency planning outlines that it was human factors and a weak nuclear emergency planning regime in Japan that was as much at fault as the natural disasters that hit north eastern Japan (1). The chapter on nuclear emergency planning was written by Professor David Boiller of the French ngo acro, a group that were also responsible for doing a considerable amount of independent marine sampling in the Fukushima area (2). Key points on nuclear emergency planning from the report include:
1  Emergency planning for dealing with the nuclear accident at Fukushima was not functional, and the evacuation process became chaotic, leading to many people being unnecessarily exposed to radiation.
2  Despite early public announcements that the radiation releases would not harm public health, the evacuation radiuses changed several times.
3  Evacuation planning based on circles with diameters of several kilometres is too rigid and hopelessly inadequate in the case of nuclear power plants.
4  Special software for predicting fallout patterns was not used correctly. In some cases, people were evacuated to areas with more, not less, radiation.
5 Evacuation procedures of vulnerable people failed. Patients from one hospital and a nearby home for the elderly were sent to shelters: 45 of 440 patients died after staff fled. In another incident, more than 90 elderly people were left without carers. Hospitals in Fukushima prefecture have had to suspend services because hundreds of doctors and nurses in the area resigned to avoid radiation.
6 The Fukushima crisis also exposed that one of the key principles of nuclear emergency plans – confinement (recommending people to stay in their homes to avoid radiation exposure) – simply does not work in practice.
7 Communities where people were confined for up to 10 days ran out of food, as well as fuel needed for eventual evacuation. In addition, specialised workers – such as drivers, nurses, doctors, social workers and firemen, who were needed to help those confined – were not prepared to stay in an area receiving large amounts of radiation.
8 The post-emergency situation is also riddled with problems – including dealing with contaminated food and land, higher radiation safety limits, insufficient monitoring of radiation levels and major problems with long-term decontamination.

The nuclear free local authorities have forwarded this report to leading officials in the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the Office for Nuclear Regulation and the UK nuclear emergency planning liaison group. A full review of uk emergency planning was expected to be completed by the end of 2011, but to date it has still not been published (3).  Some of these issues are also being considered by nuclear site stakeholders groups across the UK

.           Organising  such efficient and effective safeguards would add to the already  huge  financial burden of nuclear power on our country, the billions of pounds involved would be far better spent giving every householder and public building free solar panels and support for community truly renewable energy groups!
            Can you please express my concerns to Ed Davey about the disastrous financial  implications for many centuries to come  if   new nuclear power stations are built , and my fears for everyones’ safety.


            Yours sincerely,

Monday, 12 March 2012

News from Japan

Dear Friends all over the world,
 
On March 11th 2012, the first commemoration day of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, 16,000 people gathered in Koriyama City in Fukushima Prefecture, filled with anger against TEPCO and the Japanese Government.
 
Block restarting of any nuclear power plant in periodical inspection!
Stop exportation of nuclear power plants to Vietnam, Jordan and other countries!
Abolish all nuclear power plants immediately!
 
In Solidarity,
International Labor Solidarity Committee of Doro-Chiba
http://www.doro-chiba.org/english/english2.htm
 

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Guess who is commercial manager of Horizon Nuclear Power

John Moriarty must be an excellent recruit for Horizon with his DECC background and his professed skills in government and parliamentary procedure

2nd John Moriarty
Commercial Manager at Horizon Nuclear Power
Gloucester, United Kingdom Utilities
Current
Commercial Manager at Horizon Nuclear Power (Sole Proprietorship)
Past
Policy manager at Department of Energy and Climate Change
Policy Manager at Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
Education
University of Nottingham
Stonyhurst College
Connections
63 connections
Public Profile
http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/john-moriarty/49/600/93b
Share
PDF
Print
Flag
Experience

Commercial Manager
Horizon Nuclear Power (Sole Proprietorship)
Sole Proprietorship; 51-200 employees; Utilities industry
July 2010 – Present (1 year 9 months)

Policy manager
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Government Agency; 501-1000 employees; Government Administration industry
July 2008 – June 2010 (2 years) Whitehall Place, London

Development of feed-in tariffs for small scale low carbon electricity generation
Policy Manager
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
June 2006 – June 2008 (2 years 1 month)

Head of microgeneration policy
Skills & Expertise

Energy Contract Management Business Planning IT Management Renewable Energy Nuclear Energy Financial Instruments Energy Policy Energy Trading Wind Energy Microgeneration distributed energy Government Parliamentary Procedure
 
Site Meter